Sign up for the newsletter and get our free 30-page eBook on course strategy!
Swing Caddie SC300i Launch Monitor Review: The Complete Package
Swing Caddie recently announced that its SC300 launch monitor was discontinued and replaced by the SC300i. Since this is one of the most popular personal launch monitors on the market, I was interested in testing out the newer version to see any meaningful changes.
In this review, I’ll go over the updates, testing results, and how the Swing Caddie SC300i fits into the growing market of launch monitors priced under $500.
The Long and Short of It
The personal launch monitor category has exploded over the last few years. I get emails daily from readers who come across my reviews and buying guide. Since there are more options available, golfers get confused by what separates each product from one another. I do my best to steer people in the right direction based on their needs (you can always contact me here).
Swing Caddie is the original innovator in the space. You could say that the Swing Caddie SC100 “kicked off” interest in low-cost launch monitors. Years later, I still find myself recommending their products to most people for two reasons:
- They are easy to use
- They work
Forgive me for the brevity. I value simplicity in all things golf – whether I’m talking about strategy or technology products. And simplicity is why Swing Caddie continues to be one of the leaders in launch monitors.
Many products I’ve tested have apps that can be confusing or require additional hardware like your phone or tablet to record shots. The last thing I want is for golfers to start their practice sessions fidgeting with technology that’s cumbersome to use. The Swing Caddie 300i continues the brand’s “easy and effective” advantage.
What Has Changed?
The Swing Caddie SC300 was a huge hit. It was accurate, easy to set up, and offered additional features over the Swing Caddie SC200+.
The main thing I like about the SC300 is that it did have an accompanying app, but it was not required for use. You always had the option of quickly turning it on and seeing all of your stats (or having them called out loud). If you wanted to sync your phone or tablet to the app, you had that option too.
The other products at this price level, the Flightscope mevo , and Rapsodo MLM, will not work unless you use an app on your cell phone or tablet. For some, that’s not a big deal. But for many other golfers I have communicated with, it’s a dealbreaker.
The SC300i measures the same parameters as the original SC300:
- Swing Speed
- Ball Speed
- Smash Factor
- Carry & Total Yardages
- Launch Angle
- Apex (Max Height)
- Spin rate (using the mobile app only)
Perhaps the biggest news is that the accompanying app did get a nice upgrade.
Swing Caddie has cleaned up the user interface quite a bit. There is enhanced data presentation of all of your clubs. Most notably, there is an option of analyzing your swing with video. The good news is that owners of the original SC300 will get this feature as well. Here are some screenshots from the new app:
My Testing
I prefer to test launch monitors indoors because I can control the variables. Also, since all personal launch monitors are radar-based, it’s a stiffer test to see which units have the better sensor. Almost any radar-based unit will work better outdoors because it has more room to see the ball travel. When I go outside to the range, I do have the tradeoff of using range balls, which won’t give me the most accurate results.
The original Swing Caddie SC300 had very favorable numbers compared to my SkyTrak (a camera-based, more expensive option at $2000) on carry distances and ball speed. But other parameters like launch angle really struggled.
Since the SC300i has newer components, I expected the sensor to be a bit more accurate, and it delivered nicely.
Here are comparisons to SkyTrak on carry distance:
| Club | SkyTrak Carry Yardage | SC300i Carry Yardage |
|---|---|---|
| Pitch Shot (LW) | 58 | 55.5 |
| SW | 100 | 98.4 |
| GW | 124.5 | 127 |
| 9-iron | 153 | 150 |
| 7-iron | 175 | 173.7 |
| Driver | 268 | 264 |
I found these yardages to be slightly more accurate than the previous SC300. Overall, while SkyTrak isn’t perfect (no launch monitor is), the SC300i performed extremely well on the carry distance metric. All of these numbers are in line with yardages I’ve verified on multiple products, including Trackman and the Foresight Sports GCQuad. Additionally, my ball speed was within the same narrow margins.
The largest improvement I saw on the Swing Caddie SC300i is with launch angle. The previous model had numbers that were as much as 15-20% different than SkyTrak. Here are the launch angle measurements I recorded:
| Club | SkyTrak Launch Angle | SC300i Launch Angle |
|---|---|---|
| Pitch Shot (LW) | 29.5 | 27.5 |
| SW | 29 | 27.2 |
| GW | 23.5 | 22 |
| 9-iron | 20.8 | 21.5 |
| 7-iron | 17.2 | 17.7 |
| Driver | 15 | 15.6 |
I don’t pay too much attention to most of my clubs’ launch angle, except with my driver. It can be a handy tool for optimizing your driver’s distance.
That’s why I was happy to see that the SC300i was giving much more reliable metrics on launch angle; this will allow golfers to experiment with things like ball position, tee height, or even driver loft settings (be careful).
How the SC300i Fits Into the Marketplace
As I mentioned, there are many choices amongst personal launch monitors ($500 and below). Here are my current recommendations versus other devices.
PRGR and Swing Caddie SC200+
The PRGR and SC200+ are the best options for people at a lower budget level.
At $199, the PRGR is an excellent choice but is more of a “no-frills” offering. There is no remote, you’ll have to adjust clubs manually, and it will only measure distance, ball speed, and swing speed.
If you want to save money but want a more polished product than the PRGR, the Swing Caddie SC200+ is still a great alternative at $289. The SC300i is a bit more accurate than the SC200+, but if you’re willing to sacrifice using an app and the added measurements such as launch angle, the SC200+ is a tremendous value.
You can read my reviews of these two options here:
Swing Caddie SC300i vs. Rapsodo MLM
The comparison between the Rapsodo MLM and the SC300i get’s a bit trickier. The MLM is a fantastic product at a similar price point. But there are some pros and cons of using each.
Based on my testing, the accuracy between the two units is comparable. Rapsodo recently added indoor functionality, and I still think their app is superior (even with the new Swing Caddie update). But there are two main drawbacks:
- The MLM does require the use of an iPhone or iPad to display your data. For some, this might not be a big deal, but for others, it can be a nuisance worrying about charging another battery or having your iPhone overheat in direct sunlight.
- Currently, the Rapsodo MLM only works on iOS. There are still plans for Android, but they are not there yet. So if you don’t have an iPhone or iPad, you cannot use the Rapsodo MLM.
Overall, my main recommendation is that those who value simplicity in a product should go with the SC300i. If having a robust app is more important to you, then the Rapsodo MLM is a fantastic product as well. These are still the two best choices in the category.
You can read my full Rapsodo MLM review here.
Swing Caddie SC300i vs. FlightScope mevo
The FlightScope mevo is a direct competitor to the SC300i in terms of pricing and features. However, when most people ask me which one they should get, I tell them all to go with the SC300i.
In my testing, I found the mevo to struggle indoors, and I didn’t love the app’s functionality (which is required to see your data). Overall, I think the SC300i is a more polished product, easier to use, and more accurate.
You can read my full FlightScope mevo review here.
Wrapping It Up
The Swing Caddie SC300i continues as one of the leaders in the personal launch category space. I think the app’s reworking and improved accuracy with newer sensors make it a great value. It remains one of the best overall picks for those who have a larger budget and want more features.
You can purchase it here with a special offer for Practical Golf readers at $449.
If you are looking for ways to practice with a launch monitor, you can check this guide out.
Thanks for the review. I have been looking at getting a personal launch monitor and was wondering between the SC300i and the Rapsodo, can you get an idea of your dispersion with the SC300i like you do with the Rapsodo? Also, curious in how accurate the spin numbers are on the SC300i?
The SC300i will not display dispersion in the app. Spin rates can be a mixed bag when using it outdoors because it will rely on the range ball which can differ from a premium ball.
How does the 300i identify if you slice your drive
Hi Jon. How accurate is the device outdoors with full and partial wedge shots? Thanks
I’ve found these units to be pretty accurate outdoors, the only main variable will be the quality of the range balls you are using. They can affect spin rates and ball speed, which will be picked up by the launch monitor. Just know that it could be a different number than you would see with a premium golf ball.
Nice summary, Jon. I’ve been using and recommending the SC300 since late 2019 and have been quite pleased, overall, with the product and its output… until the recent 2021 firmware version update. Now, my SC300 story has become a cautionary tale.
My main complaints with the SC300 were/are:
1) no shot dispersion data, but that was a “known” deficit I accepted at purchase
2) it often struggles to capture a shot in bright, direct sunlight (which occurs quite frequently in Southern California), sometimes missing 20% to 25% of the balls hit in a session. Understandable that “skulled”, “topped” and other mishits might not be captured, those mishits are not what I’m referring to. No bueno!
3) Ensuring the placement at setup is correct (i.e. 5 ft. to 6 ft. behind the ball and approximately the same elevation) requires a bit of diligence at the beginning of a session or you will experience noticeable variations between recorded sessions, and… here’s the BIG ONE…
4) based on my experience, the recent firmware update (App v2.1.17 / Firmware V201110110110) has significant glitches that are unacceptable, to the extent they invalidate the claim that the SC300 hasn’t been rendered obsolete by the introduction of the SC300i model and its software. Examples: The Date stamp of an imported practice session is often incorrectly stamped as the import date rather than the actual practice session date the shots were recorded. Carry Distances with same clubs, same range/balls, similar conditions are significantly different (i.e. 10% to 15% difference indicating 160 yds when I know it’s 185, etc.) and inaccurate based on the marked range target distances and corroborated with my rangefinder. And the new data tables and screens displaying the recorded individual club data and calculated/graphed information have yet to work correctly within my app. Basically, old features broken, new features not working. Adn the firmware wiped out my custom club settings stored in the software. All quite disappointing, overall!
Now, ending on a positive note, the export data feature, which wasn’t available in the original SC300 software, allows you to easily create and export a .csv file to software (i.e. Excel, G-Sheets, etc. ) you can use to perform shot data analysis to the extent and level of detail you desire… if you have the knowledge, chops and desire.
Maybe it’s user error on my part? I would be curious to hear the experiences from other SC300 users who updated to the new firmware. Hopefully, mine is a one-off that can be remedied; otherwise, I’d say Swing Caddie hampered the original SC300 and sent it down the rankings list of top shot monitors and, with it, my previous satisfaction and support!
Everything you said is correct sir.
Thanks for corroboratiing the issues, Don. Hopefully we loyal SC300 owners/customers won’t be forgotten and left behind as they move to an upgraded product.
While this is frustrating, it’s not uncommon for software updates. My recommendation would be to reach out to the Swing Caddie team on their website directly. I will let them know of the issue as well. My guess is they are aware of it, and will hopefully fix it in a future update.
I hope you are correct, Jon. I’ve found, in business, it’s generally cheaper to keep your existing customers and “Net Promoters” than to lose them and have to replace them with a new customer. (That’s a brutal, more costly hamster wheel for a company to get stuck on.) And there are other, highly-competitive products and choices available in this space. Hopefully they’ll do the right thing with the existing SC300 cusotmer base.
Again, not attempting to undermine and hi-jack your review thread about the SC300i. I’ve been a Swing Caddie fanboy since 2019 when I made my decision to purchase. It’s an investment in game improvement. Thanks again for a well-written and informative review.
So Jon, this is an encouraging review, I was wondering about spin rates, I know you said outside can be a mixed bag due to range balls, how did you find them indoors with your regular premium balls?
Im also interested in this. My range has premium balls, so if it’s accurate with spin, that would be a big addition at this price point.
I am interested in a device I can use hitting into a net in my backyard. Is there a minimum distance needed from where the ball is struck to the net? Does the device read from the side opposite the player or from behind the player?
Thanks!!
It reads from behind. Based on my testing, you’ll want about 3-5 feet behind the ball, and just as much (if not more) in front of the ball.
Jon, is there an option to read swing speed without actually hitting a ball?
I bought the PRGR, because of that reason. I belive the SC200+ is also capable of that, but the SC300 wasn’t.
If the SC300i is able to do that, then I would definitely think about investing in one.
Thanks,
Unfortunately that is not a feature of the SC300i
How accurate is the SC 300i during a practice round?
A great review here Jon. I am so close to taking the plunge. All your reviews have really helped me try and decide what to spend my very limited budget on.
Unfortunately the PRGR doesn’t have as many data options for me as I would like to see apex, left and right dispersion, and spin rates, on top of the base set it has.
The same is true for the SC200 Plus.
The Mevo is above my budget, which is a shame as I believe it has everything I need there.
I know you mentioned that the SC300i will display spin rate. Is this side spin as well as normal spin? And please could you give more information about how accurate it is, compared to say, the Mevo?
For some reason, I get the impression, I don’t know where from, that the spin rate it gives will be a calculated one, that may be indicative only. Do you have any data on this?
I may have to wait and save up for a second hand Mevo unit so I have the confidence that it will give me the data I am looking for.
Unfortunately I live in a flat, without access to a garden, so will never get the opportunity to use any launch monitor indoors, however my parents have a small garden they don’t use, so I may be able to set something up there.
Love this website, love The Sweet Spot, you’re bringing such great information to the average golfer and really filling the exact niche that I was seeking to improve my golf game. Thank you very much (and Adam too).
Thanks!
I would definitely recommend the SC300i over the mevo, especially if you use it indoors. I find it an overall easier product to use and have had more luck with accuracy. The spin rate on the SC300i is available through an app (does not display on the screen of the launch monitors). But this will just be total spin (calculated), not sidespin. I would caution you that a measurement like that won’t be as accurate as perhaps a SkyTrak, or more expensive monitor, but a good estimate.
Thanks for listening to the Sweet Spot glad you enjoy it 🙂
I live in Calgary, Alberta, Canada and have a SC300 with the updated app. We are at about 3000 ft above sea level. The barometric pressure shown at startup seems to be about 13 percent lower than data from weather apps. I have checked actual distance on shots versus the SC300 distance and the SC300 seems to overestimate distances by about 13 percent. Has anyone else who lives at elevation have this issue?