Hit Down on the Ball, and Take Huge Divots: It’s Not Entirely True
‘Hit down on the ball’ is a phrase that has been told to golfers struggling to improve their ball striking for decades. The conventional wisdom has always been that better golfers will take a huge divot with their iron shots, and the key to “compressing” the golf ball is to produce an extremely steep club path towards impact.
We see pros on TV taking a big divot all of the time, and to be honest I have always assumed this was the secret to becoming a better ball striker myself. I’ve often told golfers who are struggling to hit their irons well, that the key to getting the ball up in the air, is hitting down on it. While it sounds counterintuitive, that’s just what I had been taught.
The problem is that most golfers fail to translate such terms as ‘hitting down on the ball’ into an actual swing move. It might be explained to them by their local teaching pro; they will nod their head in approval, and then when they go to swing the club they end up hitting these terribly fat shots that go nowhere.
They end up striking the turf before the golf ball, which is the exact opposite of what you want.
What I’d like to suggest is that you don’t need to hit down on the ball as steeply as you think in order to hit great iron shots.
I’ll warn you that there is some technical information ahead, but I will try to make it as simple as possible for you to digest. The main reason I agree with the three teachers below is because I have been able to play effective golf, and be a relatively solid ball striker without having a steep swing that produces an enormous divot.
This is one myth about the golf swing that I would like you to understand is not necessarily true, and it actually can be harmful to your game.
Update: There’s an exciting new product that we reviewed that can help with your ground interaction. Check out the Divot Board review here.
I’m a Picker
For most of my golfing life, I have been a picker of the golf ball. I never took a huge divot, and I always believed this was some kind of deficiency in my game. I chalked it up to the fact that I had done most of my practice on range mats when I was younger, so I didn’t get the real feedback of practicing on grass, and learning how to take those perfect divots in front of the golf ball.
The strange thing is that when I have gotten a chance to practice on grass ranges, and focused on taking bigger divots that were considered the right kind, I really didn’t notice any change in my ball flight or distance.
Additionally, when I was consciously trying to hit down on the ball on the golf course to take these bigger divots, I would just hit a ton of heavy shots. We’ll get into why that was happening later in the article.
So while I felt I might have been missing something, I was never really able to prove to myself that taking a bigger divot actually improved my shots. In fact, it made a lot of them worse.
If Steve Stricker can be one of the best golfers in the world without taking a huge divot, then it was good enough for me.
Hitting down can be harmful
Joe Mayo is the director of instruction at TPC Summerlin in Las Vegas. I see him on Twitter quite a bit (you can find him @TrackmanMaestro). I came across his article entitled The Truth About Ball Flight Laws. It’s very interesting, and I encourage you to read the whole thing.
What struck me was his explanation about why better iron play does not require a divot.
He doesn’t suggest that amateurs shouldn’t try to hit down on the ball. His argument is that recreational golfers will do more harm than good to their game by trying to strike the ball more steeply with the intent of making a large divot because of their swing speeds.
Without the necessary swing speed to impart extra backspin on the ball, you’ll end up hitting the ball lower and shorter than you should. Instead, what I suggest for better iron play is to hit the ball on as shallow an angle as you can while still aligning the iron’s sweet spot behind the ball at impact.
This is a powerful statement. If you are not deriving any extra benefit with the steeper strike, then why go for it? He says that the ball will come out lower and shorter. But why would that happen? We were led to believe that the steeper strike was going to produce a towering iron shot that would have a ton of spin on it??
A word you might have heard before in ball striking discussions is compression. We have always been told that in order to compress the ball more you have to strike down on it very steeply. While many tour players do this extremely well (Sergio Garcia comes to mind), it’s just not a viable pursuit for the rest of us.
Andrew Rice gives a very interesting discussion about compression in this article.
With the advent of radar devices like Trackman, we are accurately able to measure all kinds of information about what’s going on with the golf ball at impact that we never knew before. It’s challenged a lot of commonly-held beliefs in golf. While the teaching community is divided on benefits using Trackman during instruction, there’s no question that the data it has provided has helped dispel the notion that there is only one right way to swing a golf club.
One of the main points Andrew discusses in this article is that hitting down on the ball does not necessarily increase your compression.
Translation – the ball will not go farther, or spin more simply because you are steepening your angle of attack with your irons.
Watch this video, I believe this is a fantastic explanation of why hitting down on the ball more on its own does not produce a better golf shot.
This gets back to Joe Mayo’s argument that if you lack the swing speed of a professional golfer, a steeper angle of attack will simply produce lower shot trajectories that don’t travel as far. So in your quest to hit the ball farther by striking down on it, you actually might have done the exact opposite!
You might be a little confused at this point. Let me add a different explanation that I hope will provide some clarity.
I’m going to connect the dots a little bit here.
I stated earlier in this article that many golfers will take a concept like hitting down on the ball, and then make a mess of it when it comes to actually executing the shot.
This is the most difficult thing about golf instruction. You not only have to explain a swing thought to a pupil, but you have to make them understand it, and THEN translate it to their golf swing.
So while listening to an explanation of why you should hit down on the golf ball might make sense to you theoretically, you’ll have similar results to me, which is you’ll just hit the ball too heavy.
Simply put, you’ve gone overboard, and your swing is now too steep when your mind is actively thinking about “hitting down.”
The reason I was hitting shots heavy when I tried to hit down on the ball was because I was moving the low point of my golf swing behind the ball. This is probably one of the main reasons why so many golfers fail when they try to master this concept.
Adam Young wrote this article a few months ago that got a lot of attention, and for good reason.
He explains a very important concept of the golf swing, and gives a strong visual representation that helps make sense of why golfers fail to consistently hit great iron shots.
The golf swing is a circular motion, and every circle has a low point.
Better players all have the low point of their swing in front of the golf ball (which is indicated by the black line in the image below). This means they are making contact with the ball first, and then their club will interact with the turf at some point ahead of the ball.
He used this video to show how a pro achieves this. You can see this player makes a tremendous, violent divot after striking the ball first. But we learned earlier that the divot isn’t necessary for the rest of us.
Here is where most golfers get it wrong, especially when they try to hit down on the ball. Their intentions and results are completely different.
When all you are thinking about is steepening your swing, it’s very likely that the low point of your swing arc will come behind the ball like the picture below. You’ll be making contact with the ground first instead of the golf ball. It’s the exact opposite of how the pros do it.
In my opinion, this is the reason why most golfers should not try to hit down on a golf ball. Your conscious mind will be telling your body something that it will not completely understand, and your results will likely not improve.
After all, isn’t that the goal of any swing change?
Putting it all together – You Don’t Necessarily Need a Divot
Alright, I’ve hit you with a lot of information. Let me try to summarize here.
- Hitting down on the ball on its own does not necessarily produce a better golf shot.
- You can still properly compress the ball without taking a divot, or a steep angle of attack with the golf club.
- The pursuit of a steeper golf swing can cause more harm than good by moving the low point of your swing behind the ball.
In order to hit great iron shots you still need to technically hit down on the ball, but it’s just not as steep as we were led to believe.
I hope I’ve opened your eyes a little bit on this concept, and you understand the core issue a little bit better. The next time you are told to hit down on the ball more, it might be best to ignore that advice because your body might do something completely different than what your mind is telling it to do.
i am 82 years old and i know that age takes it toll. but for the past ten years my game has morphed into a complete disaster. i just cannot get the ball the air. i keep hitting the ball on top. can you help?
See if your right hip slides to the right. Just hit tees until it is fixed.
I somewhat agree with this artical but I disagree with a lot of it. I am a new golfer I started last year and just this year I learned to strike down on the ball taking a large divot after the ball, especially with my short irons, long irons a more picker style strike works better for me. At first my idea of a golf shit was I had to get under the ball. Trying to hit down on it led me down a road of either hitting fat or chopping the ball with the bottom of the club. It wasn’t until I straightened out some issues with swing plane and firing sequence that I was able to strike down on the ball taking large divots. Once I had my swing “click” and I learned to hit the ball on a downward strike I realized this gave my shots SO much more distance, height, spin and control. I don’t get in the artical where you say hitting down on the ball will not work well with someone who swings slower. Hitting down on the ball allows you to catch the ball when the club is accelerating at it’s fastest point no matter how fast your swing is. Once your swing arch bottoms out it decelerating. It’s much easier to throw something down than it is across or up, no? I am not a fast swinger, mostly right now because I cannot swing above 80% with much control, but even my 80% swing which is not that fast, get’s pure iron shots that do have good height and distance. 7 iron 150, 8 iron 140, and so on, pretty average really. Lastly, as I’m learning, golf is not about hitting one swing plane or one angle of attack, it’s about learning how to hit from any angle of attack based on lie and/or how you want to traject or shape your shot. This article is acting as if you have to do one or the other. That’s not true. Long irons require more of a picker strike unless you have a super fast swing and short irons definitely benefit from a healthy downward strike. Even beginner golfers like myself must learn to hit from different angles based on the club, lie, and shot. The quicker we all learn, that and get away from this black or white stuff, the quicker we will advance. I suggest watching Mark Crossfields video, he preaches that with every piece of advice he gives. I see where this article is coming from but I think it’s just putting confusion/slight misinfo out there. This is just my 2 cents from a beginner golfer that is very much interested in the mechanics and has just learned to hit down on the ball.
Steve, that’s a lot preaching for 2 cents—and your perspective really isn’t worth that. You don’t seem to fully grasp the content here, maybe you should re-read it, or bring the article to a qualified instructor to help you make sense of it.
jpx ez forged says
1:You’re NEVER TOO COOL to waggle! 2:The IMPACT position is far more telling than the setup/address position-hands ahead of ball w/clubheads leading [email protected] EQUATOR of balls’ inside quadrant. 3:Hitting downward at the balls equator from inside to square like this DOES NOT NECESSARILY ALWAYS MEAN A DIVOT CAN OCCUR! YOU CAN STRIKE DOWN AND NOT DIVOT(there’s your enlightenment) .4:As manufacturers make long irons with ABSURDLY STRENGTHENED LOFTS,good luck to those trying yo get the ball up by taking off even more loft by believing such a downward strike requires a divot…5: I crush that s**t,long and straight by using the bounce of each iron.
Tod Marcus says
I agree 100% that many golfers picture MUCH too steep of a downward angle when hitting their irons.
I still feel like a little bit of down along with a forward shaft lean makes for a satisfying ball flight – but many golfers take this much too far.